Why should Hillary Clinton Win.

With the 2016 Presidential Elections coming up Hillary Clinton has decided to run for president and so has Donald Trump. But in all of the years the United States has been a country there has never been a woman for President obviously. The first president was elected in 1789 being George Washington, thats 226 years of men leading the United States and not giving a women a chance. So what does that say about us ? Are we really against women leading our country? Many other countries in their time of existing have had many woman for rulers whether its as a queen or a prime minister Norway , Britain, Lithuania ect. have all been rules by females. But why not us? When will the time for a female to lead the United States come? In my opinion the time is now. Hillary Clinton is certified beyond reason, she has experience , she is offering the right things and thinking about everyone and what is best for them. Hillary Clinton has been a first lady from 1993-2001 when her husband Bill Clinton was president. She was also the Senator of New York in 2000 and the Secretary of State for Obama. Unlike trump who has no political experience he is known for being  real estate developer and business author. Although Hillary has had all this experience she is constantly being compared to her husband. And being  told that if it wasn't for the fact that she was a women she would not have a political career, why is it that she is always compared to a male and being told that “ just because she is a women she has votes “ in a way she is being told that she may have sympathy votes. It is written that she has traveled to 112 countries , attended 306 diplomatic meetings and has spend 87 full days in airplanes. Thats more than anyone in a government has spend and cared about, she is the type of person that cares about the world and about the people she is the type of person that actually listens to the public and what we want. what she offers to us is affordable health care, raise the minimum wage, she believes in equal rights, global warming and the biggest is illegal immigrants getting there citizenship if they qualify. So what are the great things that she offers. why should we pay a lot of money to go to the dentist, the hospital or doctor? if it where for us we wouldn't but in the time of need when we have to we are always in debt from it or left broke from paying all of the bills. Global warming for many years its been a joke for a while when in all honesty we are killing the planet we live in more and more each day we have horrible pollution and we keep cutting down forest and leaving animals without homes just so we can have more homes when as of right now each US citizen could have up to 7 houses so why build more? As a woman and a citizen of the US i believe that its time for some change in this country its time for a new type of leader. to put to rest the jokes of “ if a women would be a president no country would talk to each other.” In my opinion it would be better us women are know for being more responsible than men. So what does a man that wants the best for our country offer to us. He offers taking aways the citizenship of children who were born in the US that there parents are illegal immigrants. Someone who attacks the president by saying “ Not enough good games to get into Harvard Law school.” and who blames illegal immigrants for everything that happens in the US? For someone who claims he wants whats best for all of us he isn't making good job at showing it, or offering them. 

World Poverty

On October 5, 2015 Forbes released an article that was written by John C. Goodman called “Why is there global poverty?” During the article John addressed what Barack Obama once said to the United Nations delegates. While the president was speaking to the delegates he stated that about “800 million people in the world scrape by on less than $1.25 a day and billions of people are at risk of dying from preventable diseases.”  to which John wasn't happy that Obama had said that so he shared his opinion being that the public should be angry when presidents and people who push to save world poverty without doing extensive research and getting all facts as well as what economist have recently discovered. He gives us 2 charts the first one by Kruse Kronicle, and the second one that shows the worlds worst poverty. After showing us the first chart he make a reference towards Adam Smith and a book he wrote about 240 years ago titled “ An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations” the book is centered to be the beginning of economics but Smith instead of focusing on the reason of why there is poverty he asks why is their wealth? John Brings up a question towards the president asking why there are nations in the world that are so poor that they live worse than their ancestors did to which his response was “One of the best indicators of whether a country will succeed is how it treats its women and I have to say I do not have patience for the excuse of, ‘Well, we have our own ways of doing things.” The response wasn't enough for him he believes that treating women badly isn't the reason why there is so many poverty around the world. In my opinion instead of insulting everything the president had said he could of argued back with proper facts and research not just with words he believed. Although I myself do like that he addressed what Adam Smith had one said “ don't question why there is poverty but why there is wealth” is a great quote and makes perfect sense to be in this article he should of gotten more facts and contributed them into this article. I see where John is coming from how presidents and important people from the government should have the right to have an opinion on poverty considering the fact that most of them have never been poor or have to work for 7.25 an hour and still have taxes money token out of your paycheck. Because that is most of americans working around 40 hours or more for 7.25 an hour and it sucks. In my opinion there shouldn't really be any people superior in money we should all help out each other the rich have enough money to help out every homeless person in America and help countries that living on scratch that their government cant and wont help in. we shouldn’t be greedy when it comes to money because it comes and goes but kindness and the feeling of helping someone in need is the best thing there is. To me John could of separated his feeling from this article more and stop “insulting” everything Obama had to say, put in more facts about world poverty and it would of been a great article. 

To personal no Information

    On Friday October 2 2015 the USA today published an article written by Andy Parker titled “ Oregon shooting shows we are at war.” 
   All through out the article Parker stated how we are at war on weather we should take away the right of guns or keep it. In the article he hows the 2 sides of this “war” the side of the National Rifle Association and the side of the families that have lost their loved ones by shooters or anything involving guns, but he makes it personal stating that he and his wife joined the group of families who have lost their loved ones almost a month ago. After he gives us information of how many more people join in every year. All thru ought out the article he makes it to personal with also sharing his story of how he lost his daughter and only putting one side when it should of been only about facts. Although I do understand the attachment he has on this article with loosing his loved one. The article its self is written well but there is no information about what happened in Oregon and the shooting that happened at a community college, he mostly informs us about how he feels about guns. In my opinion the article would of been better if he would informed us not only about his personal experience about losing a loved one but if he also informed us of how everything that happened in Oregon, how the students felt and those who saw it happening he should of given us primary sources point of views.